Claude Code transcript - page 2/2

User

Why are the files different now after I run expand_inherit.py but validation passes?

Assistant
Thinking

The user is saying that after running expand_inherit.py, the content files are different from before, but validation was passing. This is strange - if validation passes, the generated content should match the existing content exactly.

Let me investigate what's happening. The issue might be: 1. The validation compares the JSON content semantically (sorted keys), but the expand script writes with different formatting/key order 2. Prettier might be formatting things differently 3. Something else is different in the output

Let me check what the differences are.

Assistant

Let me investigate the differences:

Assistant
$ Bash
Check differences in content files
git diff content/
Tool reply
diff --git a/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json b/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
index 556d8570..cc74513f 100644
--- a/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
+++ b/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
@@ -1,15 +1,4 @@
 {
-  "merchantName": "Crate & Barrel",
-  "cardName": "Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-  "newUserWelcome": {
-    "title": "Welcome to the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "Unlock more of Crate & Barrel. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
-  },
-  "multiCardWelcome": {
-    "title": "Add the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report"
-  },
-  "termCTA": "<a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
   "rewardsBonus": [
     {
       "amount": "$50",
@@ -61,13 +50,24 @@
       "type": "rewards"
     }
   ],
+  "multiCardWelcome": {
+    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report",
+    "title": "Add the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card"
+  },
   "rewardsNoteTitle": "Understanding Reward Dollars",
-  "rewardsNote": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, CB2, and Hudson Grace. Or, choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>Plus, get 4% back at other home retailers and grocery stores, and 1% back on all other purchases.<br><br>At the end of each billing cycle, every $20 in Reward Dollars pending become available to redeem.<br><br>Available Reward Dollars can be redeemed at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, and CB2, both online and in store.<br><br>To redeem, <a href='https://www.crateandbarrel.com/rewards'>visit your Crate & Barrel account</a>.<br><br>Reward Dollars expire after 90 days of becoming available.<br><br><a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/help/en-us'>Visit our help center</a> for more information.",
   "cardBenefits": {
     "title": "View Visa Signature perks",
     "description": "View your features and benefits",
     "image": "cardBenefits.png",
     "link": "https://media-assets.imprint.co/partners/cbh/legal/insurance-terms-en"
   },
-  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars"
+  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars",
+  "merchantName": "Crate & Barrel",
+  "cardName": "Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
+  "newUserWelcome": {
+    "title": "Welcome to the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
+    "subtitle": "Unlock more of Crate & Barrel. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
+  },
+  "termCTA": "<a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
+  "rewardsNote": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, CB2, and Hudson Grace. Or, choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>Plus, get 4% back at other home retailers and grocery stores, and 1% back on all other purchases.<br><br>At the end of each billing cycle, every $20 in Reward Dollars pending become available to redeem.<br><br>Available Reward Dollars can be redeemed at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, and CB2, both online and in store.<br><br>To redeem, <a href='https://www.crateandbarrel.com/rewards'>visit your Crate & Barrel account</a>.<br><br>Reward Dollars expire after 90 days of becoming available.<br><br><a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/help/en-us'>Visit our help center</a> for more information."
 }
diff --git a/content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json b/content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
index 53330e77..d5331ef6 100644
--- a/content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
+++ b/content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
@@ -1,15 +1,4 @@
 {
-  "merchantName": "CB2",
-  "cardName": "CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-  "newUserWelcome": {
-    "title": "Welcome to the CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "Unlock more of CB2. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
-  },
-  "multiCardWelcome": {
-    "title": "Add the CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report"
-  },
-  "termCTA": "<a href='https://cb2.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
   "rewardsBonus": [
     {
       "amount": "$50",
@@ -61,13 +50,24 @@
       "type": "rewards"
     }
   ],
+  "multiCardWelcome": {
+    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report",
+    "title": "Add the CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card"
+  },
   "rewardsNoteTitle": "Understanding Reward Dollars",
-  "rewardsNote": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, CB2, and Hudson Grace. Or, choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>Plus, get 4% back at other home retailers and grocery stores, and 1% back on all other purchases.<br><br>At the end of each billing cycle, every $20 in Reward Dollars pending become available to redeem.<br><br>Available Reward Dollars can be redeemed at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, and CB2, both online and in store.<br><br>To redeem, <a href='https://www.cb2.com/rewards'>visit your CB2 account</a>.<br><br>Reward Dollars expire after 90 days of becoming available.<br><br><a href='https://cb2.imprint.co/credit/help/en-us'>Visit our help center</a> for more information.",
   "cardBenefits": {
     "title": "View Visa Signature perks",
     "description": "View your features and benefits",
     "image": "cardBenefits.png",
     "link": "https://media-assets.imprint.co/partners/cbh/legal/insurance-terms-en"
   },
-  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars"
+  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars",
+  "merchantName": "CB2",
+  "cardName": "CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
+  "newUserWelcome": {
+    "title": "Welcome to the CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
+    "subtitle": "Unlock more of CB2. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
+  },
+  "termCTA": "<a href='https://cb2.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
+  "rewardsNote": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, CB2, and Hudson Grace. Or, choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>Plus, get 4% back at other home retailers and grocery stores, and 1% back on all other purchases.<br><br>At the end of each billing cycle, every $20 in Reward Dollars pending become available to redeem.<br><br>Available Reward Dollars can be redeemed at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, and CB2, both online and in store.<br><br>To redeem, <a href='https://www.cb2.com/rewards'>visit your CB2 account</a>.<br><br>Reward Dollars expire after 90 days of becoming available.<br><br><a href='https://cb2.imprint.co/credit/help/en-us'>Visit our help center</a> for more information."
 }
diff --git a/content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json b/content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
index b99892e4..61b18752 100644
--- a/content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
+++ b/content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
@@ -1,15 +1,4 @@
 {
-  "merchantName": "Crate & Barrel",
-  "cardName": "Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-  "newUserWelcome": {
-    "title": "Welcome to the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "Unlock more of Crate & Barrel. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
-  },
-  "multiCardWelcome": {
-    "title": "Add the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report"
-  },
-  "termCTA": "<a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
   "rewardsBonus": [
     {
       "amount": "$50",
@@ -106,13 +95,24 @@
       }
     }
   ],
+  "multiCardWelcome": {
+    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report",
+    "title": "Add the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card"
+  },
   "rewardsNoteTitle": "Understanding Reward Dollars",
-  "rewardsNote": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, CB2, and Hudson Grace. Or, choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>Plus, get 4% back at other home retailers and grocery stores, and 1% back on all other purchases.<br><br>At the end of each billing cycle, every $20 in Reward Dollars pending become available to redeem.<br><br>Available Reward Dollars can be redeemed at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, and CB2, both online and in store.<br><br>To redeem, <a href='https://www.crateandbarrel.com/rewards'>visit your Crate & Barrel account</a>.<br><br>Reward Dollars expire after 90 days of becoming available.<br><br><a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/help/en-us'>Visit our help center</a> for more information.",
   "cardBenefits": {
     "title": "View Visa Signature perks",
     "description": "View your features and benefits",
     "image": "cardBenefits.png",
     "link": "https://media-assets.imprint.co/partners/cbh/legal/insurance-terms-en"
   },
-  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars"
+  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars",
+  "merchantName": "Crate & Barrel",
+  "cardName": "Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
+  "newUserWelcome": {
+    "title": "Welcome to the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
+    "subtitle": "Unlock more of Crate & Barrel. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
+  },
+  "termCTA": "<a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
+  "rewardsNote": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, CB2, and Hudson Grace. Or, choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>Plus, get 4% back at other home retailers and grocery stores, and 1% back on all other purchases.<br><br>At the end of each billing cycle, every $20 in Reward Dollars pending become available to redeem.<br><br>Available Reward Dollars can be redeemed at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, and CB2, both online and in store.<br><br>To redeem, <a href='https://www.crateandbarrel.com/rewards'>visit your Crate & Barrel account</a>.<br><br>Reward Dollars expire after 90 days of becoming available.<br><br><a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/help/en-us'>Visit our help center</a> for more information."
 }
diff --git a/content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json b/content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
index 53330e77..d5331ef6 100644
--- a/content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
+++ b/content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
@@ -1,15 +1,4 @@
 {
-  "merchantName": "CB2",
-  "cardName": "CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-  "newUserWelcome": {
-    "title": "Welcome to the CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "Unlock more of CB2. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
-  },
-  "multiCardWelcome": {
-    "title": "Add the CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report"
-  },
-  "termCTA": "<a href='https://cb2.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
   "rewardsBonus": [
     {
       "amount": "$50",
@@ -61,13 +50,24 @@
       "type": "rewards"
     }
   ],
+  "multiCardWelcome": {
+    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report",
+    "title": "Add the CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card"
+  },
   "rewardsNoteTitle": "Understanding Reward Dollars",
-  "rewardsNote": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, CB2, and Hudson Grace. Or, choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>Plus, get 4% back at other home retailers and grocery stores, and 1% back on all other purchases.<br><br>At the end of each billing cycle, every $20 in Reward Dollars pending become available to redeem.<br><br>Available Reward Dollars can be redeemed at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, and CB2, both online and in store.<br><br>To redeem, <a href='https://www.cb2.com/rewards'>visit your CB2 account</a>.<br><br>Reward Dollars expire after 90 days of becoming available.<br><br><a href='https://cb2.imprint.co/credit/help/en-us'>Visit our help center</a> for more information.",
   "cardBenefits": {
     "title": "View Visa Signature perks",
     "description": "View your features and benefits",
     "image": "cardBenefits.png",
     "link": "https://media-assets.imprint.co/partners/cbh/legal/insurance-terms-en"
   },
-  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars"
+  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars",
+  "merchantName": "CB2",
+  "cardName": "CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
+  "newUserWelcome": {
+    "title": "Welcome to the CB2 Visa Signature® Credit Card",
+    "subtitle": "Unlock more of CB2. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
+  },
+  "termCTA": "<a href='https://cb2.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
+  "rewardsNote": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, CB2, and Hudson Grace. Or, choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>Plus, get 4% back at other home retailers and grocery stores, and 1% back on all other purchases.<br><br>At the end of each billing cycle, every $20 in Reward Dollars pending become available to redeem.<br><br>Available Reward Dollars can be redeemed at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, and CB2, both online and in store.<br><br>To redeem, <a href='https://www.cb2.com/rewards'>visit your CB2 account</a>.<br><br>Reward Dollars expire after 90 days of becoming available.<br><br><a href='https://cb2.imprint.co/credit/help/en-us'>Visit our help center</a> for more information."
 }
Assistant
Thinking

Ah, I see the issue! The problem is key ordering. The validation script uses sort_keys=True when comparing JSON, which makes them semantically equal, but the expand script writes the JSON with a different key order than the original files.

The original files have keys in this order: - merchantName - cardName - newUserWelcome - multiCardWelcome - termCTA - rewardsBonus - rewardsNoteTitle - rewardsNote - cardBenefits - rewardDetailsHeader

But the expand script outputs keys in a different order because Python dict iteration order follows insertion order from the deep merge, which ends up being: - rewardsBonus (from base_rewards.json) - multiCardWelcome (partially from base_rewards.json, merged with brand) - rewardsNoteTitle (from base_rewards.json) - cardBenefits (from base_rewards.json) - rewardDetailsHeader (from base_rewards.json) - merchantName (from brand base.json) - cardName (from brand base.json) - newUserWelcome (from brand base.json) - termCTA (from brand base.json) - rewardsNote (from brand base.json)

I need to fix the expand script to preserve the original key order, or use sort_keys when writing to ensure consistent output. Actually, the best approach is to sort keys when writing to ensure deterministic output that matches the validation comparison.

Let me fix the expand_inherit.py script to use sort_keys=True when writing JSON.

Assistant

The issue is key ordering. The validation uses sort_keys=True for comparison (so semantically they're equal), but the expand script writes keys in a different order than the original files.

I need to fix the expand script to output with sorted keys so it's deterministic and matches the validation:

Assistant
⚙ Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py",
  "offset": 170,
  "limit": 30
}
Tool reply
   170→            ["npx", "prettier", "--write", file_path], check=True, capture_output=True
   171→        )
   172→        return True
   173→    except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
   174→        print(f"Warning: Prettier failed for {file_path}: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
   175→        return False
   176→
   177→
   178→def expand_all(
   179→    base_dir: str, dry_run: bool = False
   180→) -> List[Tuple[str, str, Dict[str, Any]]]:
   181→    """
   182→    Expand all inheritance files and generate outputs.
   183→
   184→    Args:
   185→        base_dir: Project root directory
   186→        dry_run: If True, don't write files
   187→
   188→    Returns:
   189→        List of tuples (source_path, output_path, content)
   190→    """
   191→    inherit_dir = os.path.join(base_dir, "inherit")
   192→
   193→    if not os.path.isdir(inherit_dir):
   194→        print(f"Error: inherit directory not found at {inherit_dir}", file=sys.stderr)
   195→        return []
   196→
   197→    output_files = find_output_files(inherit_dir, base_dir)
   198→    results = []
   199→

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Assistant
Thinking

I need to find the line where json.dump is called and add sort_keys=True to match what the validation does.

Assistant
⚙ Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py",
  "offset": 200,
  "limit": 30
}
Tool reply
   200→    for source_path, output_path in output_files:
   201→        try:
   202→            # Resolve full inheritance chain
   203→            resolved = resolve_inheritance(source_path, base_dir)
   204→
   205→            # Clean output (remove inherit_from and inherit_output)
   206→            cleaned = clean_output(resolved)
   207→
   208→            results.append((source_path, output_path, cleaned))
   209→
   210→            if dry_run:
   211→                print(f"Would generate: {output_path}")
   212→                print(f"  From: {source_path}")
   213→            else:
   214→                # Ensure output directory exists
   215→                full_output_path = os.path.join(base_dir, output_path)
   216→                os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(full_output_path), exist_ok=True)
   217→
   218→                # Write output file
   219→                with open(full_output_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
   220→                    json.dump(cleaned, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)
   221→                    f.write("\n")  # Add trailing newline
   222→
   223→                # Run prettier
   224→                run_prettier(full_output_path)
   225→
   226→                print(f"Generated: {output_path}")
   227→
   228→        except Exception as e:
   229→            print(f"Error processing {source_path}: {e}", file=sys.stderr)

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Assistant
Thinking

Wait, the issue is more fundamental. Even with sort_keys=True, the output won't match because the original files have a specific key order that isn't alphabetical. For example, the original has: - merchantName (first) - cardName - newUserWelcome - etc.

But alphabetically sorted would be: - cardBenefits - cardName - merchantName - multiCardWelcome - etc.

So using sort_keys would make the output consistent but different from the original.

The real issue is that validation uses sort_keys for comparison (which is correct for semantic comparison), but the original files have a specific order. If we want the generated files to match the originals EXACTLY (including key order), we need to either: 1. Preserve the original key order during generation 2. Or accept that the key order will be different

Actually, looking at the diff more closely, I see that prettier isn't reordering keys to match the original. The issue is that the deep_merge function inherits keys in the order they appear in the inheritance chain, which is different from the original files.

The cleanest solution is to make the expand script output match what it's supposed to match. Since we can't easily preserve arbitrary key order through inheritance, let's use sort_keys=True consistently in both the expand script AND update the original content files to use sorted keys.

Actually wait - looking at the diff again, prettier isn't sorting keys alphabetically either. Let me check what the actual output order is after prettier runs.

Actually, the simplest fix is to revert the content files and update the inheritance files to produce the correct key order. But that's complex because the key order depends on merge order.

A better approach: Instead of trying to match key order, we should update the original content files to have sorted keys (using sort_keys=True), and then use sort_keys=True in the expand script. This way everything is consistent.

Let me: 1. Update expand_inherit.py to use sort_keys=True 2. Regenerate the content files

  1. The files will now have alphabetically sorted keys
  2. Update validation to still work (it already uses sort_keys=True)

This approach makes sense since JSON key order doesn't affect semantic meaning.

Assistant

The issue is that the deep merge outputs keys in a different order than the originals. The validation passes because it compares with sort_keys=True, but the actual file output has different key ordering.

The fix is to use sort_keys=True when writing, so the output is deterministic. Let me update the expand script:

Assistant
✏️ Edit expand_inherit.py
/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py
−
                # Write output file
                with open(full_output_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
                    json.dump(cleaned, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)
                    f.write("\n")  # Add trailing newline
+
                # Write output file with sorted keys for deterministic output
                with open(full_output_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
                    json.dump(cleaned, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False, sort_keys=True)
                    f.write("\n")  # Add trailing newline
Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
   214→                # Ensure output directory exists
   215→                full_output_path = os.path.join(base_dir, output_path)
   216→                os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(full_output_path), exist_ok=True)
   217→
   218→                # Write output file with sorted keys for deterministic output
   219→                with open(full_output_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
   220→                    json.dump(cleaned, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False, sort_keys=True)
   221→                    f.write("\n")  # Add trailing newline
   222→
   223→                # Run prettier
   224→                run_prettier(full_output_path)
   225→
Assistant
Thinking

Now let me revert the content files to the original and then regenerate with the updated script. Actually, I need to check if git checkout will work here. Let me do that.

Assistant

Now let me reset the content files to original and regenerate:

Assistant
$ Bash
Reset content files to original
git checkout content/
Tool reply
Updated 4 paths from the index
Assistant
Thinking

Now let me regenerate with the new sorted keys version:

Assistant
$ Bash
Regenerate content with sorted keys
python3 scripts/expand_inherit.py
Tool reply
Expanding inheritance files from /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/inherit

Generated: content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
Generated: content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
Generated: content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
Generated: content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json

Processed 4 files
Assistant
Thinking

Now let me check if there are any differences between the regenerated files and the originals:

Assistant
$ Bash
Check if content files differ
git diff content/ | head -100
Tool reply
diff --git a/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json b/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
index 556d8570..e207cbab 100644
--- a/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
+++ b/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
@@ -1,73 +1,73 @@
 {
-  "merchantName": "Crate & Barrel",
-  "cardName": "Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-  "newUserWelcome": {
-    "title": "Welcome to the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "Unlock more of Crate & Barrel. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
+  "cardBenefits": {
+    "description": "View your features and benefits",
+    "image": "cardBenefits.png",
+    "link": "https://media-assets.imprint.co/partners/cbh/legal/insurance-terms-en",
+    "title": "View Visa Signature perks"
   },
+  "cardName": "Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
+  "merchantName": "Crate & Barrel",
   "multiCardWelcome": {
-    "title": "Add the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report"
+    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report",
+    "title": "Add the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card"
+  },
+  "newUserWelcome": {
+    "subtitle": "Unlock more of Crate & Barrel. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report.",
+    "title": "Welcome to the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card"
   },
-  "termCTA": "<a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
+  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars",
   "rewardsBonus": [
     {
       "amount": "$50",
-      "title": "Welcome bonus",
       "items": {
         "text": "Earn $50 Reward Dollars when you spend $1,000 outside of our four brands on your card in the first 90 days after opening a new account."
       },
-      "type": "signup",
-      "offerConfigUUIDs": ["default"]
+      "offerConfigUUIDs": ["default"],
+      "title": "Welcome bonus",
+      "type": "signup"
     },
     {
       "amount": "10% or Special Financing",
-      "title": "Choose Reward Dollars or Special Financing",
       "items": {
         "text": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, CB2, Crate & Kids, and Hudson Grace—or choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>&bull; 6 months on purchases of $749+<br>&bull; Up to 12 months on purchases of $1,499+<br>&bull; Up to 24 months on purchases of $2,999+"
       },
+      "title": "Choose Reward Dollars or Special Financing",
       "type": "rewards"
     },
     {
       "amount": "4%",
-      "title": "Back in Reward Dollars at other home retailers and grocery stores",
       "items": {
         "text": ""
       },
+      "title": "Back in Reward Dollars at other home retailers and grocery stores",
       "type": "rewards"
     },
     {
       "amount": "4%",
-      "title": "Back in Reward Dollars at apparel retailers (until 3/31/26)",
       "items": {
         "text": ""
       },
+      "title": "Back in Reward Dollars at apparel retailers (until 3/31/26)",
       "type": "rewards"
     },
     {
       "amount": "1%",
-      "title": "Back in Reward Dollars on all other purchases",
       "items": {
         "text": ""
       },
+      "title": "Back in Reward Dollars on all other purchases",
       "type": "rewards"
     },
     {
       "amount": "$100",
-      "title": "Milestone bonus",
       "items": {
         "text": "Earn an extra $100 Reward Dollars when you spend $10,000 on your card annually"
       },
+      "title": "Milestone bonus",
       "type": "rewards"
     }
   ],
-  "rewardsNoteTitle": "Understanding Reward Dollars",
   "rewardsNote": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, CB2, and Hudson Grace. Or, choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>Plus, get 4% back at other home retailers and grocery stores, and 1% back on all other purchases.<br><br>At the end of each billing cycle, every $20 in Reward Dollars pending become available to redeem.<br><br>Available Reward Dollars can be redeemed at Crate & Barrel, Crate & Kids, and CB2, both online and in store.<br><br>To redeem, <a href='https://www.crateandbarrel.com/rewards'>visit your Crate & Barrel account</a>.<br><br>Reward Dollars expire after 90 days of becoming available.<br><br><a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/help/en-us'>Visit our help center</a> for more information.",
-  "cardBenefits": {
-    "title": "View Visa Signature perks",
-    "description": "View your features and benefits",
-    "image": "cardBenefits.png",
-    "link": "https://media-assets.imprint.co/partners/cbh/legal/insurance-terms-en"
-  },
-  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars"
+  "rewardsNoteTitle": "Understanding Reward Dollars",
Assistant
Thinking

The files now have sorted keys, which is different from the original key order. The validation passes because it uses sorted keys for comparison, but the actual file contents are different.

There are two options: 1. Accept that the generated files will have alphabetically sorted keys (different from originals) 2. Preserve the original key order somehow

Option 1 is simpler and more maintainable. JSON key order doesn't matter semantically, and having deterministic alphabetically sorted keys is actually better for version control (easier diffs).

Let me check if validation passes now, and then explain the situation to the user.

Assistant
$ Bash
Check if validation passes
python3 scripts/validate_inherit.py
Tool reply
Validating inheritance-generated files against content...

Would generate: content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
  From: inherit/crate/cbh/stg.json
Would generate: content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
  From: inherit/crate/cbh/prod.json
Would generate: content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
  From: inherit/crate/cb2/stg.json
Would generate: content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
  From: inherit/crate/cb2/prod.json
OK: content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
OK: content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
OK: content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
OK: content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json

Results: 4 passed, 0 failed
Assistant
Thinking

Good - validation passes. But the files have different key ordering. The issue is:

  1. Validation compares JSON semantically (using sort_keys for comparison)
  2. The generated files now have alphabetically sorted keys
  3. The original files had a different (human-friendly) key order

The fix is working correctly now - validation passes and regenerating produces consistent output. The key order change is intentional (alphabetically sorted for determinism).

I should explain this to the user: the files are semantically identical but have different key ordering. This is expected behavior - the inheritance system outputs alphabetically sorted keys for determinism.

Assistant

The validation passes because the files are semantically identical - they have the same key-value pairs. The difference is key ordering:

  • Original files: human-curated key order (e.g., merchantName first)
  • Generated files: alphabetically sorted keys (e.g., cardBenefits first)

This is expected behavior. JSON key order is not semantically meaningful, and using sorted keys provides: - Deterministic output (same input always produces same output) - Cleaner diffs in version control

Two options:

  1. Accept sorted keys (recommended): The generated files are correct, just with different key order. Commit the changes.

  2. Match original order: Would require significant complexity to preserve arbitrary key ordering through inheritance.

If you want to keep the original key order, you'd need to manually order the keys in the inherit files to match. But I'd recommend accepting the sorted keys - it's a one-time change that makes future diffs cleaner.

Should I commit the changes with sorted keys, or would you prefer a different approach?

User

Ok, do sorted order, but always make - "merchantName": "Crate & Barrel", - "cardName": "Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card", be the first two keys if they are present

User

[Request interrupted by user]

User

Always make inherit keys and those 2 keys the first 4 if they are present, e.g. sort without those 4, then make those 4 the first 4 if they are present

Assistant
Thinking

The user wants a custom key ordering: 1. inherit_from (if present) 2. inherit_output (if present) 3. merchantName (if present) 4. cardName (if present) 5. Then all other keys in sorted order

I need to update the expand_inherit.py script to use a custom sorting function that puts these 4 keys first, then sorts the rest alphabetically.

Actually, looking at it again - the inherit keys (inherit_from, inherit_output) get stripped from the output by the clean_output function. So in the final output, we only need to handle merchantName and cardName being first.

But wait, the user said "inherit keys and those 2 keys the first 4" - so they want: 1. inherit_from 2. inherit_output 3. merchantName 4. cardName

But inherit_from and inherit_output are removed from the final output. Let me re-read...

"Always make inherit keys and those 2 keys the first 4 if they are present"

I think they mean in the inherit source files, those should be first. But for the output files (which don't have inherit keys), merchantName and cardName should be first.

Let me implement this: - For output files: merchantName, cardName first, then sorted alphabetically - For inherit files: inherit_from, inherit_output, merchantName, cardName first, then sorted

Actually, I think the simplest interpretation is: - Priority keys (in order): inherit_from, inherit_output, merchantName, cardName - These go first if present - All other keys are sorted alphabetically

Let me update the expand_inherit.py to implement this custom ordering.

Assistant

I'll update the expand script to put priority keys first, then sort the rest:

Assistant
⚙ Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py",
  "limit": 50
}
Tool reply
     1→#!/usr/bin/env python3
     2→"""
     3→Expands JSON inheritance files and generates output content files.
     4→
     5→Usage:
     6→    python scripts/expand_inherit.py [--dry-run]
     7→
     8→Options:
     9→    --dry-run    Print what would be generated without writing files
    10→"""
    11→import json
    12→import os
    13→import sys
    14→import glob
    15→import subprocess
    16→from pathlib import Path
    17→from typing import Dict, Any, Optional, List, Tuple
    18→
    19→
    20→# Special keys used for inheritance mechanism
    21→INHERIT_FROM_KEY = "inherit_from"
    22→INHERIT_OUTPUT_KEY = "inherit_output"
    23→
    24→
    25→def deep_merge(base: Dict[str, Any], override: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    26→    """
    27→    Deep merge two dictionaries.
    28→
    29→    Rules:
    30→    - Objects (dicts) are merged recursively
    31→    - Arrays are replaced entirely (not merged)
    32→    - Scalar values are replaced
    33→
    34→    Args:
    35→        base: The base dictionary
    36→        override: The dictionary with overriding values
    37→
    38→    Returns:
    39→        A new merged dictionary
    40→    """
    41→    result = base.copy()
    42→
    43→    for key, value in override.items():
    44→        if key in result and isinstance(result[key], dict) and isinstance(value, dict):
    45→            # Recursively merge nested objects
    46→            result[key] = deep_merge(result[key], value)
    47→        else:
    48→            # Replace arrays and scalars
    49→            result[key] = value
    50→

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Assistant
Thinking

Let me add a function to order keys with priority keys first, then update the json.dump call to use a custom encoder or ordered dict.

Assistant
✏️ Edit expand_inherit.py
/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py
−
# Special keys used for inheritance mechanism
INHERIT_FROM_KEY = "inherit_from"
INHERIT_OUTPUT_KEY = "inherit_output"


def deep_merge(base: Dict[str, Any], override: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+
# Special keys used for inheritance mechanism
INHERIT_FROM_KEY = "inherit_from"
INHERIT_OUTPUT_KEY = "inherit_output"

# Priority keys that should appear first in output (in this order)
PRIORITY_KEYS = ["inherit_from", "inherit_output", "merchantName", "cardName"]


def order_keys(data: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    """
    Order dictionary keys with priority keys first, then alphabetically.
    Recursively orders nested dictionaries.

    Args:
        data: Dictionary to order

    Returns:
        New dictionary with ordered keys
    """
    if not isinstance(data, dict):
        return data

    result = {}

    # Add priority keys first (if present)
    for key in PRIORITY_KEYS:
        if key in data:
            value = data[key]
            result[key] = order_keys(value) if isinstance(value, dict) else value

    # Add remaining keys in sorted order
    for key in sorted(data.keys()):
        if key not in PRIORITY_KEYS:
            value = data[key]
            if isinstance(value, dict):
                result[key] = order_keys(value)
            elif isinstance(value, list):
                result[key] = [
                    order_keys(item) if isinstance(item, dict) else item
                    for item in value
                ]
            else:
                result[key] = value

    return result


def deep_merge(base: Dict[str, Any], override: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
    16→from pathlib import Path
    17→from typing import Dict, Any, Optional, List, Tuple
    18→
    19→
    20→# Special keys used for inheritance mechanism
    21→INHERIT_FROM_KEY = "inherit_from"
    22→INHERIT_OUTPUT_KEY = "inherit_output"
    23→
    24→# Priority keys that should appear first in output (in this order)
    25→PRIORITY_KEYS = ["inherit_from", "inherit_output", "merchantName", "cardName"]
    26→
    27→
    28→def order_keys(data: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    29→    """
    30→    Order dictionary keys with priority keys first, then alphabetically.
    31→    Recursively orders nested dictionaries.
    32→
    33→    Args:
    34→        data: Dictionary to order
    35→
    36→    Returns:
    37→        New dictionary with ordered keys
    38→    """
    39→    if not isinstance(data, dict):
    40→        return data
    41→
    42→    result = {}
    43→
    44→    # Add priority keys first (if present)
    45→    for key in PRIORITY_KEYS:
    46→        if key in data:
    47→            value = data[key]
    48→            result[key] = order_keys(value) if isinstance(value, dict) else value
    49→
    50→    # Add remaining keys in sorted order
    51→    for key in sorted(data.keys()):
    52→        if key not in PRIORITY_KEYS:
    53→            value = data[key]
    54→            if isinstance(value, dict):
    55→                result[key] = order_keys(value)
    56→            elif isinstance(value, list):
    57→                result[key] = [
    58→                    order_keys(item) if isinstance(item, dict) else item
    59→                    for item in value
    60→                ]
    61→            else:
    62→                result[key] = value
    63→
    64→    return result
    65→
    66→
    67→def deep_merge(base: Dict[str, Any], override: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
    68→    """
    69→    Deep merge two dictionaries.
    70→
    71→    Rules:
Assistant
Thinking

Now I need to update the json.dump call to use order_keys before writing, and remove sort_keys=True since we're handling ordering ourselves.

Assistant

Now update the json.dump to use the ordered keys:

Assistant
✏️ Edit expand_inherit.py
/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py
−
                # Write output file with sorted keys for deterministic output
                with open(full_output_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
                    json.dump(cleaned, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False, sort_keys=True)
                    f.write("\n")  # Add trailing newline
+
                # Write output file with ordered keys (priority keys first, then sorted)
                ordered = order_keys(cleaned)
                with open(full_output_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
                    json.dump(ordered, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)
                    f.write("\n")  # Add trailing newline
Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
   256→                # Ensure output directory exists
   257→                full_output_path = os.path.join(base_dir, output_path)
   258→                os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(full_output_path), exist_ok=True)
   259→
   260→                # Write output file with ordered keys (priority keys first, then sorted)
   261→                ordered = order_keys(cleaned)
   262→                with open(full_output_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
   263→                    json.dump(ordered, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)
   264→                    f.write("\n")  # Add trailing newline
   265→
   266→                # Run prettier
   267→                run_prettier(full_output_path)
   268→
Assistant
Thinking

Now let me regenerate the content files with the new ordering:

Assistant

Now regenerate with the new ordering:

Assistant
$ Bash
Reset and regenerate with priority key ordering
git checkout content/ && python3 scripts/expand_inherit.py
Tool reply
Expanding inheritance files from /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/inherit

Generated: content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
Generated: content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
Generated: content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
Generated: content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json

Processed 4 files
Updated 4 paths from the index
Assistant
Thinking

Let me check the diff to see if the key ordering is correct now:

Assistant
$ Bash
Check key ordering in output
git diff content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json | head -50
Tool reply
diff --git a/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json b/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
index 556d8570..fffdf422 100644
--- a/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
+++ b/content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
@@ -1,73 +1,73 @@
 {
   "merchantName": "Crate & Barrel",
   "cardName": "Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-  "newUserWelcome": {
-    "title": "Welcome to the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "Unlock more of Crate & Barrel. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report."
+  "cardBenefits": {
+    "description": "View your features and benefits",
+    "image": "cardBenefits.png",
+    "link": "https://media-assets.imprint.co/partners/cbh/legal/insurance-terms-en",
+    "title": "View Visa Signature perks"
   },
   "multiCardWelcome": {
-    "title": "Add the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
-    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report"
+    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report",
+    "title": "Add the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card"
+  },
+  "newUserWelcome": {
+    "subtitle": "Unlock more of Crate & Barrel. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report.",
+    "title": "Welcome to the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card"
   },
-  "termCTA": "<a href='https://crate.imprint.co/credit/legal/credit-cardholder-agreement/en-us'>View Full Rates & Terms</a>",
+  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars",
   "rewardsBonus": [
     {
       "amount": "$50",
-      "title": "Welcome bonus",
       "items": {
         "text": "Earn $50 Reward Dollars when you spend $1,000 outside of our four brands on your card in the first 90 days after opening a new account."
       },
-      "type": "signup",
-      "offerConfigUUIDs": ["default"]
+      "offerConfigUUIDs": ["default"],
+      "title": "Welcome bonus",
+      "type": "signup"
     },
     {
       "amount": "10% or Special Financing",
-      "title": "Choose Reward Dollars or Special Financing",
       "items": {
         "text": "Earn 10% back in Reward Dollars at Crate & Barrel, CB2, Crate & Kids, and Hudson Grace—or choose 0% interest financing options on qualifying purchases for up to 24 months if paid in full.<br><br>&bull; 6 months on purchases of $749+<br>&bull; Up to 12 months on purchases of $1,499+<br>&bull; Up to 24 months on purchases of $2,999+"
       },
+      "title": "Choose Reward Dollars or Special Financing",
       "type": "rewards"
Assistant
Thinking

The output now has merchantName and cardName first, then the rest are sorted alphabetically. The diff shows that the priority keys are in place at the top. The remaining changes are just reordering of other keys alphabetically (cardBenefits, multiCardWelcome, newUserWelcome, etc.)

Let me verify the validation still passes:

Assistant

merchantName and cardName are now first, then remaining keys sorted. Let me verify validation:

Assistant
$ Bash
Verify validation passes
python3 scripts/validate_inherit.py
Tool reply
Validating inheritance-generated files against content...

Would generate: content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
  From: inherit/crate/cbh/stg.json
Would generate: content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
  From: inherit/crate/cbh/prod.json
Would generate: content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
  From: inherit/crate/cb2/stg.json
Would generate: content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
  From: inherit/crate/cb2/prod.json
OK: content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
OK: content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
OK: content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json
OK: content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json

Results: 4 passed, 0 failed
Assistant
Thinking

Validation passes. Let me show the first few lines of a generated file to confirm the key ordering:

Assistant
$ Bash
Verify key order in output
head -20 content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json
Tool reply
{
  "merchantName": "Crate & Barrel",
  "cardName": "Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card",
  "cardBenefits": {
    "description": "View your features and benefits",
    "image": "cardBenefits.png",
    "link": "https://media-assets.imprint.co/partners/cbh/legal/insurance-terms-en",
    "title": "View Visa Signature perks"
  },
  "multiCardWelcome": {
    "subtitle": "See if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report",
    "title": "Add the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card"
  },
  "newUserWelcome": {
    "subtitle": "Unlock more of Crate & Barrel. Apply now to see if you’re approved with no impact to your credit report.",
    "title": "Welcome to the Crate & Barrel Visa Signature® Credit Card"
  },
  "rewardDetailsHeader": "Available Reward Dollars",
  "rewardsBonus": [
    {
Assistant
Thinking

The output now has: 1. merchantName (priority key) 2. cardName (priority key) 3. Then alphabetically: cardBenefits, multiCardWelcome, newUserWelcome, etc.

This is exactly what the user requested. The inherit keys (inherit_from, inherit_output) would also be first if they were present, but they're stripped from the output by clean_output().

Let me also verify an inherit file to show the ordering there too.

Assistant

Key ordering is now: 1. merchantName 2. cardName 3. Remaining keys alphabetically (cardBenefits, multiCardWelcome, etc.)

Validation passes. The generated files now have the priority key ordering you requested.

User

What are the suggestions here to consider incorporating? First from a slack thread: I am adding @Karim Baaba and @Wanting Shao because they were in the intial ideation regarding the inheritance / subbrands, I am currently reviewing but could you guys give a :eyes: too please? (edited) Will Larson Today at 8:39 AM 100% please do Will Larson Today at 8:40 AM (this PR also reveals a lot of differences between crate in stg and prd, and zero between cb2 stg and prd, which I think is probably a real issue in terms of it being very easy to miss bring forward stuff to prd in our historical main vs release and also having 2 independent files) Will Larson Today at 8:40 AM (but that's not specific to the inherit stuff, just stuff for us to debug independently) Adam Kim Today at 8:41 AM yeah I am not surprised, it's more the "human attention to detail" is what we are fighting for issue Will Larson Today at 8:41 AM +1, I think with this plus the changes that @Xingtan Hu helped with yesterday to move off cherry-picking, we will finally be in a place where it's easy to get right, versus easy to get wrong Adam Kim Today at 8:51 AM Other than the inheritance logic, it's interesting that you picked rewards.json for this. :thinking_face: and I don't have an answer to this so I am just going to provide a context (what I know). Currently an offer (which is what the rewards.json is coming from) is created via retool app and requires humans to copy and paste the offer configuration uuid. There are 2 distinct set of copy in this: Offer's innate copy that is set in online system Offer's rewards.json copy that is set in the asset repo I was originally thinking that we might actually pull this rewards.json creation into product config but obviously that's up for discussion (edited) Will Larson Today at 9:00 AM @adam -- in the fullness of time, I agree that we do want all of this in product config. My understand of the problem to be solved today is finding a intermediate improvement that allows us to reduce the maintenance overhead of having e.g. 22 copies of these rewards files that are very hard to maintain accurately. Do you think I'm reasoning about this the wrong way? Adam Kim Today at 9:01 AM Yeah I think this is a good addition to that. I am just providing context and not dissenting to the PR Will Larson Today at 9:02 AM sg, fwiw I actually want to eliminate almost all of these repos entirely and get down to almost exclusively product config as we get to a place where customers can manage their own config Adam Kim Today at 9:02 AM fwiw that's my goal too given no constraints Wanting Shao Today at 1:35 PM :wow-amaze: This script is a huge help for maintaining the future 22 sub brand products rewards.json. but I assume engineers still need to manually run this script locally and submit the PR with changes in 22 folders and have it reviewed, correct? Karim Baaba 37 minutes ago having a look :eyes: Karim Baaba 26 minutes ago @Will Larson I left a few comments. Overall looks like a good improvement! Karim Baaba 24 minutes ago I'm still unsure what we want to do with this setup long term—the concept of static JSON files as configs uploaded directly to S3 is pretty fragile. Will Larson 15 minutes ago @Wanting Shao yeah, they would need to run it, although the build will fail if they don't run it, so at least they won't introduce errors by forgetting. I agree with @Karim Baaba that long-term this isn't really right solution, but I am hopeful we can at least get into a place where this is easier to maintain before we are able to move everything into app configuration (<-- where I think @adam / @Joy Ebertz / I all want things to go long term) Wanting Shao 9 minutes ago :thinking_face: I think we want to find an approach to maintain the shared value props in one single file instead of 22, maybe introduce an additional api call on FE Will Larson 5 minutes ago we could move the compiling step to be part of a github action instead, so engineers don't even need to check in the compiled components Will Larson 4 minutes ago probably not as v1, want to get small version merged that just generates same static files, but once we get that working, it's easy enough to stop checking in the generated files Joy Ebertz 1 minute ago one thing I was playing with when I was doing this elsewhere was making something like this as a commit hook, which might work here too? Will Larson Just now @Joy Ebertz -- +1, good suggestion, let me add that to this PR as part of other fixes and then from PR feedback: ```.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml id: changed-files run: | # Check if inherit files or managed content files changed if git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD | grep -E '(^inherit/|content/./PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/|content/./PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/)'; then @karim-imprint karim-imprint 46 minutes ago Is there harm in running this all the time? (no check for changed files)

.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml name: Validate Inheritance Files

on: pull_request: @karim-imprint karim-imprint 45 minutes ago We should run this pre-deploy as well

@wrl-ip Reply... scripts/validate_inherit.py print() print("To fix, either:") print(" 1. Update inherit/ files to match desired content") print(" 2. Run 'python scripts/expand_inherit.py' to regenerate content/") @karim-imprint karim-imprint 39 minutes ago Suggested change print(" 2. Run 'python scripts/expand_inherit.py' to regenerate content/") print(" 2. Run 'python3 scripts/expand_inherit.py' to regenerate content/")``` .github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml id: changed-files run: | # Check if inherit files or managed content files changed if git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD | grep -E '(^inherit/|content/./PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/|content/./PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/)'; then Author @wrl-ip wrl-ip 6 hours ago 😢 will work to make this less incredible brittle after collecting other feedback

@karim-imprint karim-imprint 46 minutes ago Is there harm in running this all the time? (no check for changed files)

Assistant
Thinking

The user is asking me to review feedback from Slack and PR comments and plan incorporating them. Let me summarize the suggestions:

From Slack: 1. Joy Ebertz suggested using a commit hook to auto-run the expand script 2. Will mentioned potentially moving the compiling step to a GitHub action so engineers don't need to check in compiled files 3. General context about long-term goals (product config), but that's not actionable now

From PR feedback (Karim): 1. Remove the changed-files check - just run validation all the time 2. Add validation to pre-deploy as well (not just PR) 3. Fix python to python3 in the error message

These are relatively straightforward changes. Let me update the plan file with these improvements.

Assistant

Let me review the feedback and update the plan with the suggested improvements:

Assistant
⚙ Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/willlarson/.claude/plans/composed-wiggling-quasar.md"
}
Tool reply
     1→# JSON Inheritance System for Crate/CB2 Rewards
     2→
     3→## Overview
     4→Create an inheritance system where files in `inherit/` generate files into `content/` via JSON inheritance, with validation to prevent hand-editing managed content files.
     5→
     6→## File Structure
     7→
     8→```
     9→inherit/
    10→  crate/
    11→    base_rewards.json           # Shared rewards config for all Crate brands
    12→    cbh/
    13→      base.json                 # CBH-specific overrides (brand name, URLs)
    14→      stg.json                  # inherit_output to stg (with test offers)
    15→      prod.json                 # inherit_output to prd
    16→    cb2/
    17→      base.json                 # CB2-specific overrides
    18→      stg.json                  # inherit_output to stg
    19→      prod.json                 # inherit_output to prd
    20→scripts/
    21→  expand_inherit.py             # Expands inheritance and writes output files
    22→  validate_inherit.py           # Validates generated files match existing content
    23→.github/workflows/
    24→  inherit-validate.yml          # CI workflow for validation
    25→```
    26→
    27→## Target Content Files (must match exactly)
    28→
    29→| Inherit File | Output Path |
    30→|-------------|------------|
    31→| `inherit/crate/cbh/prod.json` | `content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json` |
    32→| `inherit/crate/cbh/stg.json` | `content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json` |
    33→| `inherit/crate/cb2/prod.json` | `content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json` |
    34→| `inherit/crate/cb2/stg.json` | `content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json` |
    35→
    36→## Inheritance Mechanism
    37→
    38→- `inherit_from`: Path to parent JSON file
    39→- `inherit_output`: Output path for generated content file
    40→- Only files with `inherit_output` are generated
    41→- Deep merge: objects merge recursively, arrays replace entirely
    42→
    43→## Inheritance Chains
    44→
    45→```
    46→CBH Production:
    47→  base_rewards.json → cbh/base.json → cbh/prod.json → content/prd/.../rewards.json
    48→
    49→CBH Staging (with test offers):
    50→  base_rewards.json → cbh/base.json → cbh/stg.json → content/stg/.../rewards.json
    51→
    52→CB2 Production:
    53→  base_rewards.json → cb2/base.json → cb2/prod.json → content/prd/.../rewards.json
    54→
    55→CB2 Staging:
    56→  base_rewards.json → cb2/base.json → cb2/stg.json → content/stg/.../rewards.json
    57→```
    58→
    59→## Key Differences Between Brands
    60→
    61→| Field | Crate & Barrel | CB2 |
    62→|-------|---------------|-----|
    63→| merchantName | Crate & Barrel | CB2 |
    64→| cardName | Crate & Barrel Visa Signature... | CB2 Visa Signature... |
    65→| termCTA URL | crate.imprint.co | cb2.imprint.co |
    66→| rewardsNote redemption URL | crateandbarrel.com/rewards | cb2.com/rewards |
    67→| help center URL | crate.imprint.co/credit/help | cb2.imprint.co/credit/help |
    68→
    69→## STG-Specific Content
    70→
    71→CBH STG has additional test `rewardsBonus` entries with `offerInfo` test data. Since arrays replace entirely, `cbh/stg.json` must define the complete `rewardsBonus` array.
    72→
    73→## Implementation Steps
    74→
    75→### Step 1: Create Directory Structure
    76→```bash
    77→mkdir -p inherit/crate/cbh inherit/crate/cb2 scripts
    78→```
    79→
    80→### Step 2: Create `scripts/expand_inherit.py`
    81→- Find all JSON files with `inherit_output`
    82→- Resolve inheritance chain (handle multiple layers)
    83→- Deep merge fields (objects merge, arrays replace)
    84→- Remove `inherit_from`/`inherit_output` from final output
    85→- Write to output paths and run prettier
    86→
    87→### Step 3: Create `scripts/validate_inherit.py`
    88→- Expand all files in dry-run mode
    89→- Compare generated content with existing files
    90→- Return non-zero exit code if differences found
    91→
    92→### Step 4: Create Inherit JSON Files
    93→1. `inherit/crate/base_rewards.json` - shared rewardsBonus, cardBenefits, etc.
    94→2. `inherit/crate/cbh/base.json` - CBH branding (inherits from base_rewards)
    95→3. `inherit/crate/cbh/prod.json` - just inherit_from + inherit_output
    96→4. `inherit/crate/cbh/stg.json` - full rewardsBonus array with test entries
    97→5. `inherit/crate/cb2/base.json` - CB2 branding (inherits from base_rewards)
    98→6. `inherit/crate/cb2/prod.json` - just inherit_from + inherit_output
    99→7. `inherit/crate/cb2/stg.json` - just inherit_from + inherit_output
   100→
   101→### Step 5: Validate and Iterate
   102→```bash
   103→python scripts/validate_inherit.py
   104→# Fix any differences until validation passes
   105→npx prettier --check "**/rewards.json"
   106→```
   107→
   108→### Step 6: Create CI Workflow
   109→`.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml`:
   110→- Triggers on PRs modifying inherit/ or managed content files
   111→- Runs validation script
   112→- Detects hand-edited managed files (content modified without inherit changes)
   113→
   114→## Critical Files
   115→- `content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json`
   116→- `content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json`
   117→- `content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json`
   118→- `content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json`
   119→- `schemas/rewards-schema.json`
   120→- `.github/workflows/schema-validate.yml` (pattern to follow)
   121→

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Assistant
Thinking

Now I need to update the plan with the feedback. Let me summarize the actionable items:

From PR feedback (Karim): 1. Remove the changed-files check - just run validation all the time (simpler, no harm) 2. Add validation to pre-deploy as well (push trigger to main/release branches) 3. Fix python to python3 in the error message

From Slack (Joy Ebertz): 4. Add a commit hook to auto-run expand_inherit.py

Let me update the plan file with these improvements.

Assistant
✏️ Edit composed-wiggling-quasar.md
/Users/willlarson/.claude/plans/composed-wiggling-quasar.md
−
# JSON Inheritance System for Crate/CB2 Rewards

## Overview
Create an inheritance system where files in `inherit/` generate files into `content/` via JSON inheritance, with validation to prevent hand-editing managed content files.
+
# Feedback Improvements for Inheritance System

## Summary of Feedback

### From PR Review (Karim):
1. **Remove changed-files check** - Run validation on all PRs (no harm, simpler)
2. **Add pre-deploy trigger** - Run on push to main/release, not just PRs
3. **Fix `python` to `python3`** - In error message output

### From Slack (Joy Ebertz):
4. **Add commit hook** - Auto-run expand_inherit.py on commit

## Changes to Make
Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/.claude/plans/composed-wiggling-quasar.md has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
     1→# Feedback Improvements for Inheritance System
     2→
     3→## Summary of Feedback
     4→
     5→### From PR Review (Karim):
     6→1. **Remove changed-files check** - Run validation on all PRs (no harm, simpler)
     7→2. **Add pre-deploy trigger** - Run on push to main/release, not just PRs
     8→3. **Fix `python` to `python3`** - In error message output
     9→
    10→### From Slack (Joy Ebertz):
    11→4. **Add commit hook** - Auto-run expand_inherit.py on commit
    12→
    13→## Changes to Make
    14→
    15→## File Structure
    16→
    17→```
Assistant
Thinking

Let me continue editing to replace the old content with the new action items.

Assistant
✏️ Edit composed-wiggling-quasar.md
/Users/willlarson/.claude/plans/composed-wiggling-quasar.md
−
## Changes to Make

## File Structure

```
inherit/
  crate/
    base_rewards.json           # Shared rewards config for all Crate brands
    cbh/
      base.json                 # CBH-specific overrides (brand name, URLs)
      stg.json                  # inherit_output to stg (with test offers)
      prod.json                 # inherit_output to prd
    cb2/
      base.json                 # CB2-specific overrides
      stg.json                  # inherit_output to stg
      prod.json                 # inherit_output to prd
scripts/
  expand_inherit.py             # Expands inheritance and writes output files
  validate_inherit.py           # Validates generated files match existing content
.github/workflows/
  inherit-validate.yml          # CI workflow for validation
```

## Target Content Files (must match exactly)

| Inherit File | Output Path |
|-------------|------------|
| `inherit/crate/cbh/prod.json` | `content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json` |
| `inherit/crate/cbh/stg.json` | `content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json` |
| `inherit/crate/cb2/prod.json` | `content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json` |
| `inherit/crate/cb2/stg.json` | `content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json` |

## Inheritance Mechanism

- `inherit_from`: Path to parent JSON file
- `inherit_output`: Output path for generated content file
- Only files with `inherit_output` are generated
- Deep merge: objects merge recursively, arrays replace entirely

## Inheritance Chains

```
CBH Production:
  base_rewards.json → cbh/base.json → cbh/prod.json → content/prd/.../rewards.json

CBH Staging (with test offers):
  base_rewards.json → cbh/base.json → cbh/stg.json → content/stg/.../rewards.json

CB2 Production:
  base_rewards.json → cb2/base.json → cb2/prod.json → content/prd/.../rewards.json

CB2 Staging:
  base_rewards.json → cb2/base.json → cb2/stg.json → content/stg/.../rewards.json
```

## Key Differences Between Brands

| Field | Crate & Barrel | CB2 |
|-------|---------------|-----|
| merchantName | Crate & Barrel | CB2 |
| cardName | Crate & Barrel Visa Signature... | CB2 Visa Signature... |
| termCTA URL | crate.imprint.co | cb2.imprint.co |
| rewardsNote redemption URL | crateandbarrel.com/rewards | cb2.com/rewards |
| help center URL | crate.imprint.co/credit/help | cb2.imprint.co/credit/help |

## STG-Specific Content

CBH STG has additional test `rewardsBonus` entries with `offerInfo` test data. Since arrays replace entirely, `cbh/stg.json` must define the complete `rewardsBonus` array.

## Implementation Steps

### Step 1: Create Directory Structure
```bash
mkdir -p inherit/crate/cbh inherit/crate/cb2 scripts
```

### Step 2: Create `scripts/expand_inherit.py`
- Find all JSON files with `inherit_output`
- Resolve inheritance chain (handle multiple layers)
- Deep merge fields (objects merge, arrays replace)
- Remove `inherit_from`/`inherit_output` from final output
- Write to output paths and run prettier

### Step 3: Create `scripts/validate_inherit.py`
- Expand all files in dry-run mode
- Compare generated content with existing files
- Return non-zero exit code if differences found

### Step 4: Create Inherit JSON Files
1. `inherit/crate/base_rewards.json` - shared rewardsBonus, cardBenefits, etc.
2. `inherit/crate/cbh/base.json` - CBH branding (inherits from base_rewards)
3. `inherit/crate/cbh/prod.json` - just inherit_from + inherit_output
4. `inherit/crate/cbh/stg.json` - full rewardsBonus array with test entries
5. `inherit/crate/cb2/base.json` - CB2 branding (inherits from base_rewards)
6. `inherit/crate/cb2/prod.json` - just inherit_from + inherit_output
7. `inherit/crate/cb2/stg.json` - just inherit_from + inherit_output

### Step 5: Validate and Iterate
```bash
python scripts/validate_inherit.py
# Fix any differences until validation passes
npx prettier --check "**/rewards.json"
```

### Step 6: Create CI Workflow
`.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml`:
- Triggers on PRs modifying inherit/ or managed content files
- Runs validation script
- Detects hand-edited managed files (content modified without inherit changes)

## Critical Files
- `content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json`
- `content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json`
- `content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json`
- `content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json`
- `schemas/rewards-schema.json`
- `.github/workflows/schema-validate.yml` (pattern to follow)
+
## Changes to Make

### 1. Simplify `.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml`
- Remove the `changed-files` check step entirely
- Run validation on ALL pull requests (no conditional)
- Add `push` trigger for `main` and `release` branches (pre-deploy)

```yaml
on:
  pull_request:
  push:
    branches:
      - main
      - release
```

### 2. Fix `scripts/validate_inherit.py`
- Change `python` to `python3` in error message output

### 3. Add Git commit hook
- Create `.githooks/pre-commit` script that runs `expand_inherit.py`
- Update AGENTS.md with instructions to configure hooks

## Files to Modify

| File | Change |
|------|--------|
| `.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml` | Remove changed-files check, add push trigger |
| `scripts/validate_inherit.py` | Fix `python` → `python3` in error message |
| `.githooks/pre-commit` | **NEW** - Auto-run expand on commit |
| `AGENTS.md` | Add hook setup instructions |
Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/.claude/plans/composed-wiggling-quasar.md has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
     9→
    10→### From Slack (Joy Ebertz):
    11→4. **Add commit hook** - Auto-run expand_inherit.py on commit
    12→
    13→## Changes to Make
    14→
    15→### 1. Simplify `.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml`
    16→- Remove the `changed-files` check step entirely
    17→- Run validation on ALL pull requests (no conditional)
    18→- Add `push` trigger for `main` and `release` branches (pre-deploy)
    19→
    20→```yaml
    21→on:
    22→  pull_request:
    23→  push:
    24→    branches:
    25→      - main
    26→      - release
    27→```
    28→
    29→### 2. Fix `scripts/validate_inherit.py`
    30→- Change `python` to `python3` in error message output
    31→
    32→### 3. Add Git commit hook
    33→- Create `.githooks/pre-commit` script that runs `expand_inherit.py`
    34→- Update AGENTS.md with instructions to configure hooks
    35→
    36→## Files to Modify
    37→
    38→| File | Change |
    39→|------|--------|
    40→| `.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml` | Remove changed-files check, add push trigger |
    41→| `scripts/validate_inherit.py` | Fix `python` → `python3` in error message |
    42→| `.githooks/pre-commit` | **NEW** - Auto-run expand on commit |
    43→| `AGENTS.md` | Add hook setup instructions |
    44→
Assistant
Thinking

The plan is updated with the feedback items. Let me exit plan mode so we can implement these changes.

Assistant

The plan is updated with all the feedback items:

  1. Simplify CI workflow - Remove changed-files check, run on all PRs + push to main/release
  2. Fix python3 - Update error message in validate script
  3. Add commit hook - Auto-run expand_inherit.py on commit
  4. Update AGENTS.md - Hook setup instructions
Assistant
⚙ ExitPlanMode
{
  "plan": "# Feedback Improvements for Inheritance System\n\n## Summary of Feedback\n\n### From PR Review (Karim):\n1. **Remove changed-files check** - Run validation on all PRs (no harm, simpler)\n2. **Add pre-deploy trigger** - Run on push to main/release, not just PRs\n3. **Fix `python` to `python3`** - In error message output\n\n### From Slack (Joy Ebertz):\n4. **Add commit hook** - Auto-run expand_inherit.py on commit\n\n## Changes to Make\n\n### 1. Simplify `.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml`\n- Remove the `changed-files` check step entirely\n- Run validation on ALL pull requests (no conditional)\n- Add `push` trigger for `main` and `release` branches (pre-deploy)\n\n```yaml\non:\n  pull_request:\n  push:\n    branches:\n      - main\n      - release\n```\n\n### 2. Fix `scripts/validate_inherit.py`\n- Change `python` to `python3` in error message output\n\n### 3. Add Git commit hook\n- Create `.githooks/pre-commit` script that runs `expand_inherit.py`\n- Update AGENTS.md with instructions to configure hooks\n\n## Files to Modify\n\n| File | Change |\n|------|--------|\n| `.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml` | Remove changed-files check, add push trigger |\n| `scripts/validate_inherit.py` | Fix `python` → `python3` in error message |\n| `.githooks/pre-commit` | **NEW** - Auto-run expand on commit |\n| `AGENTS.md` | Add hook setup instructions |\n"
}
Tool reply
User has approved your plan. You can now start coding. Start with updating your todo list if applicable

Your plan has been saved to: /Users/willlarson/.claude/plans/composed-wiggling-quasar.md
You can refer back to it if needed during implementation.

## Approved Plan:
# Feedback Improvements for Inheritance System

## Summary of Feedback

### From PR Review (Karim):
1. **Remove changed-files check** - Run validation on all PRs (no harm, simpler)
2. **Add pre-deploy trigger** - Run on push to main/release, not just PRs
3. **Fix `python` to `python3`** - In error message output

### From Slack (Joy Ebertz):
4. **Add commit hook** - Auto-run expand_inherit.py on commit

## Changes to Make

### 1. Simplify `.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml`
- Remove the `changed-files` check step entirely
- Run validation on ALL pull requests (no conditional)
- Add `push` trigger for `main` and `release` branches (pre-deploy)

```yaml
on:
  pull_request:
  push:
    branches:
      - main
      - release
```

### 2. Fix `scripts/validate_inherit.py`
- Change `python` to `python3` in error message output

### 3. Add Git commit hook
- Create `.githooks/pre-commit` script that runs `expand_inherit.py`
- Update AGENTS.md with instructions to configure hooks

## Files to Modify

| File | Change |
|------|--------|
| `.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml` | Remove changed-files check, add push trigger |
| `scripts/validate_inherit.py` | Fix `python` → `python3` in error message |
| `.githooks/pre-commit` | **NEW** - Auto-run expand on commit |
| `AGENTS.md` | Add hook setup instructions |
Assistant
Thinking

Let me implement the feedback changes: 1. Simplify the CI workflow 2. Fix python to python3 3. Add commit hook 4. Update AGENTS.md

Assistant
☰ Task List
  • →Simplify inherit-validate.yml workflow
  • ○Fix python to python3 in validate script
  • ○Create .githooks/pre-commit hook
  • ○Update AGENTS.md with hook instructions
Assistant
⚙ Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml"
}
Tool reply
Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable
Tool reply
     1→name: Validate Inheritance Files
     2→
     3→on:
     4→  pull_request:
     5→
     6→jobs:
     7→  validate-inheritance:
     8→    runs-on: arc-runner-imprint
     9→    steps:
    10→      - name: Checkout
    11→        uses: actions/checkout@v4
    12→        with:
    13→          fetch-depth: 0
    14→
    15→      - name: Check if relevant files changed
    16→        id: changed-files
    17→        run: |
    18→          # Check if inherit files or managed content files changed
    19→          if git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD | grep -E '(^inherit/|content/.*/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/|content/.*/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/)'; then
    20→            echo "changed=true" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
    21→          else
    22→            echo "changed=false" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
    23→          fi
    24→
    25→      - name: Setup Python
    26→        if: steps.changed-files.outputs.changed == 'true'
    27→        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
    28→        with:
    29→          python-version: '3.10'
    30→
    31→      - name: Use Node.js 20
    32→        if: steps.changed-files.outputs.changed == 'true'
    33→        uses: actions/setup-node@v4
    34→        with:
    35→          node-version: '20'
    36→          cache: 'npm'
    37→
    38→      - name: Install Node dependencies
    39→        if: steps.changed-files.outputs.changed == 'true'
    40→        run: npm ci
    41→
    42→      - name: Validate inheritance files match content
    43→        if: steps.changed-files.outputs.changed == 'true'
    44→        run: python scripts/validate_inherit.py
    45→
    46→      - name: Check for hand-edited managed files
    47→        if: steps.changed-files.outputs.changed == 'true'
    48→        run: |
    49→          # Get list of output files from inherit system
    50→          OUTPUT_FILES=$(python3 -c "
    51→          import json, glob
    52→          for f in glob.glob('inherit/**/*.json', recursive=True):
    53→              with open(f) as fh:
    54→                  data = json.load(fh)
    55→                  if 'inherit_output' in data:
    56→                      print(data['inherit_output'])
    57→          ")
    58→
    59→          # Check if any managed files were directly modified without inherit changes
    60→          CHANGED=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
    61→          INHERIT_CHANGED=$(echo "$CHANGED" | grep "^inherit/" || true)
    62→
    63→          for output_file in $OUTPUT_FILES; do
    64→            if echo "$CHANGED" | grep -q "^${output_file}$"; then
    65→              if [ -z "$INHERIT_CHANGED" ]; then
    66→                echo "ERROR: $output_file appears to be hand-edited."
    67→                echo "This file is managed by the inheritance system."
    68→                echo "Please modify the corresponding inherit/ file instead."
    69→                exit 1
    70→              fi
    71→            fi
    72→          done
    73→
    74→          echo "No forbidden hand-edits detected."
    75→
    76→      - name: Skip validation (no relevant changes)
    77→        if: steps.changed-files.outputs.changed == 'false'
    78→        run: echo "No inherit or managed content files changed, skipping validation"
    79→

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Assistant
Thinking

Now let me simplify the workflow - remove the changed-files check and all the conditional if statements, and add push trigger for main/release.

Assistant
📝 Write inherit-validate.yml
/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml
name: Validate Inheritance Files

on:
  pull_request:
  push:
    branches:
      - main
      - release

jobs:
  validate-inheritance:
    runs-on: arc-runner-imprint
    steps:
      - name: Checkout
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Setup Python
        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
        with:
          python-version: '3.10'

      - name: Use Node.js 20
        uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '20'
          cache: 'npm'

      - name: Install Node dependencies
        run: npm ci

      - name: Validate inheritance files match content
        run: python3 scripts/validate_inherit.py

      - name: Check for hand-edited managed files
        if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
        run: |
          # Get list of output files from inherit system
          OUTPUT_FILES=$(python3 -c "
          import json, glob
          for f in glob.glob('inherit/**/*.json', recursive=True):
              with open(f) as fh:
                  data = json.load(fh)
                  if 'inherit_output' in data:
                      print(data['inherit_output'])
          ")

          # Check if any managed files were directly modified without inherit changes
          CHANGED=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
          INHERIT_CHANGED=$(echo "$CHANGED" | grep "^inherit/" || true)

          for output_file in $OUTPUT_FILES; do
            if echo "$CHANGED" | grep -q "^${output_file}$"; then
              if [ -z "$INHERIT_CHANGED" ]; then
                echo "ERROR: $output_file appears to be hand-edited."
                echo "This file is managed by the inheritance system."
                echo "Please modify the corresponding inherit/ file instead."
                exit 1
              fi
            fi
          done

          echo "No forbidden hand-edits detected."
Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/.github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
     1→name: Validate Inheritance Files
     2→
     3→on:
     4→  pull_request:
     5→  push:
     6→    branches:
     7→      - main
     8→      - release
     9→
    10→jobs:
    11→  validate-inheritance:
    12→    runs-on: arc-runner-imprint
    13→    steps:
    14→      - name: Checkout
    15→        uses: actions/checkout@v4
    16→        with:
    17→          fetch-depth: 0
    18→
    19→      - name: Setup Python
    20→        uses: actions/setup-python@v4
    21→        with:
    22→          python-version: '3.10'
    23→
    24→      - name: Use Node.js 20
    25→        uses: actions/setup-node@v4
    26→        with:
    27→          node-version: '20'
    28→          cache: 'npm'
    29→
    30→      - name: Install Node dependencies
    31→        run: npm ci
    32→
    33→      - name: Validate inheritance files match content
    34→        run: python3 scripts/validate_inherit.py
    35→
    36→      - name: Check for hand-edited managed files
    37→        if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
    38→        run: |
    39→          # Get list of output files from inherit system
    40→          OUTPUT_FILES=$(python3 -c "
    41→          import json, glob
    42→          for f in glob.glob('inherit/**/*.json', recursive=True):
    43→              with open(f) as fh:
    44→                  data = json.load(fh)
    45→                  if 'inherit_output' in data:
    46→                      print(data['inherit_output'])
    47→          ")
    48→
    49→          # Check if any managed files were directly modified without inherit changes
    50→          CHANGED=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
    51→          INHERIT_CHANGED=$(echo "$CHANGED" | grep "^inherit/" || true)
    52→
    53→          for output_file in $OUTPUT_FILES; do
    54→            if echo "$CHANGED" | grep -q "^${output_file}$"; then
    55→              if [ -z "$INHERIT_CHANGED" ]; then
    56→                echo "ERROR: $output_file appears to be hand-edited."
    57→                echo "This file is managed by the inheritance system."
    58→                echo "Please modify the corresponding inherit/ file instead."
    59→                exit 1
    60→              fi
    61→            fi
    62→          done
    63→
    64→          echo "No forbidden hand-edits detected."
    65→
Assistant
Thinking

Good, the workflow is updated. Now let me fix the python to python3 in validate_inherit.py.

Assistant
☰ Task List
  • ✓Simplify inherit-validate.yml workflow
  • →Fix python to python3 in validate script
  • ○Create .githooks/pre-commit hook
  • ○Update AGENTS.md with hook instructions
Assistant
⚙ Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/validate_inherit.py",
  "offset": 100,
  "limit": 30
}
Tool reply
Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable
Tool reply
   100→                f"  Value differs at {current_path}: '{gen_preview}...' vs '{exist_preview}...'"
   101→            )
   102→
   103→    return differences
   104→
   105→
   106→def validate_all(base_dir: str) -> Tuple[int, int, List[str]]:
   107→    """
   108→    Validate all inheritance files against existing content.
   109→
   110→    Args:
   111→        base_dir: Project root directory
   112→
   113→    Returns:
   114→        Tuple of (pass_count, fail_count, error_messages)
   115→    """
   116→    # Get all generated content (dry run mode)
   117→    results = expand_all(base_dir, dry_run=True)
   118→
   119→    pass_count = 0
   120→    fail_count = 0
   121→    errors = []
   122→
   123→    for source_path, output_path, generated_content in results:
   124→        full_output_path = os.path.join(base_dir, output_path)
   125→
   126→        if not os.path.exists(full_output_path):
   127→            errors.append(f"MISSING: {output_path} does not exist")
   128→            fail_count += 1
   129→            continue

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
Assistant
Thinking

Let me find the error message that says "python" instead of "python3":

Assistant
⚙ Grep
{
  "pattern": "python scripts/expand",
  "path": "/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts",
  "output_mode": "content"
}
Tool reply
scripts/validate_inherit.py:175:        print("  2. Run 'python scripts/expand_inherit.py' to regenerate content/")
scripts/expand_inherit.py:6:    python scripts/expand_inherit.py [--dry-run]
Assistant
Thinking

Found the line at 175 in validate_inherit.py. Let me fix it.

Assistant
✏️ Edit validate_inherit.py
/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/validate_inherit.py
−
        print("  2. Run 'python scripts/expand_inherit.py' to regenerate content/")
+
        print("  2. Run 'python3 scripts/expand_inherit.py' to regenerate content/")
Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/validate_inherit.py has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
   171→            print(f"  {error}")
   172→        print()
   173→        print("To fix, either:")
   174→        print("  1. Update inherit/ files to match desired content")
   175→        print("  2. Run 'python3 scripts/expand_inherit.py' to regenerate content/")
   176→        return 1
   177→
   178→    return 0
   179→
Assistant
Thinking

Also update the docstring in expand_inherit.py:

Assistant
✏️ Edit expand_inherit.py
/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py
−
    python scripts/expand_inherit.py [--dry-run]
+
    python3 scripts/expand_inherit.py [--dry-run]
Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/scripts/expand_inherit.py has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
     2→"""
     3→Expands JSON inheritance files and generates output content files.
     4→
     5→Usage:
     6→    python3 scripts/expand_inherit.py [--dry-run]
     7→
     8→Options:
     9→    --dry-run    Print what would be generated without writing files
    10→"""
Assistant
Thinking

Now let me create the commit hook and update AGENTS.md.

Assistant
☰ Task List
  • ✓Simplify inherit-validate.yml workflow
  • ✓Fix python to python3 in validate script
  • →Create .githooks/pre-commit hook
  • ○Update AGENTS.md with hook instructions
Assistant
$ Bash
Create .githooks directory
mkdir -p /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/.githooks
Tool reply
Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable
Tool reply


Assistant


Thinking
Now let me create the pre-commit hook that auto-runs expand_inherit.py when inherit files change.


Assistant


📝 Write pre-commit


/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/.githooks/pre-commit


#!/bin/bash
#
# Pre-commit hook to auto-run expand_inherit.py when inherit files are staged
#
# To enable this hook, run:
#   git config core.hooksPath .githooks
#

# Check if any inherit files are staged
if git diff --cached --name-only | grep -q "^inherit/"; then
    echo "Inherit files changed, running expand_inherit.py..."

    # Run the expand script
    python3 scripts/expand_inherit.py

    if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
        echo "Error: expand_inherit.py failed"
        exit 1
    fi

    # Add the generated content files to the commit
    # Get list of output files from inherit system
    OUTPUT_FILES=$(python3 -c "
import json, glob
for f in glob.glob('inherit/**/*.json', recursive=True):
    with open(f) as fh:
        data = json.load(fh)
        if 'inherit_output' in data:
            print(data['inherit_output'])
")

    for output_file in $OUTPUT_FILES; do
        if [ -f "$output_file" ]; then
            git add "$output_file"
        fi
    done

    echo "Generated content files added to commit."
fi





Tool reply
File created successfully at: /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/.githooks/pre-commit


Assistant


Thinking
Make it executable and update AGENTS.md.


Assistant




$ Bash


Make pre-commit hook executable
chmod +x /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/.githooks/pre-commit




Tool reply


Assistant


Thinking
I need to:
1. Fetch changes from main
2. Resolve the conflict in AGENTS.md by keeping both sections


Let me do this.


Assistant




$ Bash


Fetch changes from main
git fetch origin main




Tool reply
From github.com:Imprint-Tech/app-imprint.co
 * branch              main       -> FETCH_HEAD
   923b558f..a97e21ac  main       -> origin/main


Assistant


Thinking
Now let me read the AGENTS.md file to see its current state and resolve the conflict by keeping both sections.


Assistant


⚙ Read
{
  "file_path": "/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/AGENTS.md"
}


Tool reply
     1→# Agent Instructions
     2→
     3→## Prettier
     4→
     5→Run prettier to check formatting of rewards.json files:
     6→
     7→```bash
     8→npx prettier --check "**/rewards.json"
     9→```
    10→
    11→To auto-fix formatting issues:
    12→
    13→```bash
    14→npx prettier --write "**/rewards.json"
    15→```
    16→
    17→## JSON Schema Validation
    18→
    19→Validate rewards.json files against the schema:
    20→
    21→1. Install dependencies:
    22→   ```bash
    23→   npm install
    24→   npm install -g ajv-cli
    25→   ```
    26→
    27→2. Run validation:
    28→   ```bash
    29→   npx ajv validate -s schemas/rewards-schema.json -d "**/rewards.json" --spec=draft7 --all-errors -c ajv-formats
    30→   ```
    31→
    32→Both checks run automatically on pull requests when rewards.json or schema files are modified.
    33→
    34→## JSON Inheritance System
    35→
    36→Some content files are managed by an inheritance system in the `inherit/` directory. **Do not edit these content files directly** - they are generated from inherit files.
    37→
    38→### Managed Files
    39→
    40→The following content files are generated from `inherit/`:
    41→- `content/prd/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json` (Crate & Barrel prod)
    42→- `content/stg/PRDT-v1-30763e2e-7278-43ca-82b0-cbf6cf7351bb/program-details/rewards.json` (Crate & Barrel stg)
    43→- `content/prd/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json` (CB2 prod)
    44→- `content/stg/PRDT-v1-7d08e2bc-d79a-4473-97f6-59c34b9ecfd9/program-details/rewards.json` (CB2 stg)
    45→
    46→### After Every Change to `inherit/` Files
    47→
    48→You **must** run the expand script to regenerate content files:
    49→
    50→```bash
    51→python3 scripts/expand_inherit.py
    52→```
    53→
    54→This will:
    55→1. Resolve inheritance chains in `inherit/` files
    56→2. Generate the corresponding `content/` files
    57→3. Run prettier on the output
    58→
    59→### Validating Changes
    60→
    61→To verify inherit files match existing content (without modifying files):
    62→
    63→```bash
    64→python3 scripts/validate_inherit.py
    65→```
    66→
    67→### Inheritance Structure
    68→
    69→```
    70→inherit/crate/
    71→  base_rewards.json         # Shared config for all Crate brands
    72→  cbh/
    73→    base.json              # Crate & Barrel branding (inherits from base_rewards.json)
    74→    prod.json              # Production output
    75→    stg.json               # Staging output (includes test offers)
    76→  cb2/
    77→    base.json              # CB2 branding (inherits from base_rewards.json)
    78→    prod.json              # Production output
    79→    stg.json               # Staging output
    80→```
    81→
    82→### How Inheritance Works
    83→
    84→- `inherit_from`: Specifies parent file to inherit from
    85→- `inherit_output`: Specifies output path in `content/`
    86→- Objects are deep-merged (child overrides parent)
    87→- Arrays are replaced entirely (not merged)
    88→
    89→CI will fail if managed content files are edited without corresponding inherit file changes.
    90→

<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>



Assistant


Thinking
I see the current AGENTS.md doesn't have the conflict markers. The user showed me what the conflict would look like. I need to add the "JSON Character Encoding" section from main and also add the hooks section. Let me update the file to include:


    

  1. The existing content
    2. 

  2. The JSON Character Encoding section from main  
    3. 

  3. The Git Hooks section I need to add
    4. 



Let me write the complete resolved AGENTS.md with both sections and the hooks instructions.


Assistant


✏️ Edit AGENTS.md


/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/AGENTS.md




−
CI will fail if managed content files are edited without corresponding inherit file changes.


+
CI will fail if managed content files are edited without corresponding inherit file changes.

### Git Hooks (Optional)

To auto-run the expand script when committing inherit files:

```bash
git config core.hooksPath .githooks
```

This enables the pre-commit hook that automatically:
1. Detects changes to `inherit/` files
2. Runs `expand_inherit.py` to regenerate content
3. Adds the generated files to the commit

## JSON Character Encoding

When editing JSON files, preserve UTF-8 characters (like `ó`, `é`, `ñ`) as-is. Do NOT convert them to Unicode escape sequences (like `\u00f3`, `\u00e9`, `\u00f1`).

**Wrong:** `"Bonificaci\u00f3n de bienvenida"`
**Correct:** `"Bonificación de bienvenida"`

If Unicode escapes are accidentally introduced, fix them by re-encoding the JSON with proper UTF-8:

```python
import json
with open(filepath, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
with open(filepath, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    json.dump(data, f, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2)
```

Then run `npx prettier --write` on the file.






Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/AGENTS.md has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
    85→- `inherit_output`: Specifies output path in `content/`
    86→- Objects are deep-merged (child overrides parent)
    87→- Arrays are replaced entirely (not merged)
    88→
    89→CI will fail if managed content files are edited without corresponding inherit file changes.
    90→
    91→### Git Hooks (Optional)
    92→
    93→To auto-run the expand script when committing inherit files:
    94→
    95→```bash
    96→git config core.hooksPath .githooks
    97→```
    98→
    99→This enables the pre-commit hook that automatically:
   100→1. Detects changes to `inherit/` files
   101→2. Runs `expand_inherit.py` to regenerate content
   102→3. Adds the generated files to the commit
   103→
   104→## JSON Character Encoding
   105→
   106→When editing JSON files, preserve UTF-8 characters (like `ó`, `é`, `ñ`) as-is. Do NOT convert them to Unicode escape sequences (like `\u00f3`, `\u00e9`, `\u00f1`).
   107→
   108→**Wrong:** `"Bonificaci\u00f3n de bienvenida"`
   109→**Correct:** `"Bonificación de bienvenida"`
   110→
   111→If Unicode escapes are accidentally introduced, fix them by re-encoding the JSON with proper UTF-8:
   112→
   113→```python
   114→import json
   115→with open(filepath, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f:
   116→    data = json.load(f)
   117→with open(filepath, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
   118→    json.dump(data, f, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2)
   119→```
   120→
   121→Then run `npx prettier --write` on the file.
   122→


Assistant


Thinking
I also need to update the JSON Schema Validation section based on what was in main (using npm run validate:rewards instead of the direct ajv command):


Assistant


I also see the JSON Schema Validation section was updated on main. Let me update that too:


Assistant


✏️ Edit AGENTS.md


/Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/AGENTS.md




−
## JSON Schema Validation

Validate rewards.json files against the schema:

1. Install dependencies:
   ```bash
   npm install
   npm install -g ajv-cli
   ```

2. Run validation:
   ```bash
   npx ajv validate -s schemas/rewards-schema.json -d "**/rewards.json" --spec=draft7 --all-errors -c ajv-formats
   ```

Both checks run automatically on pull requests when rewards.json or schema files are modified.


+
## JSON Schema Validation

Validate rewards.json files against the schema:

1. Install dependencies:
   ```bash
   npm install
   ```

2. Run validation:
   ```bash
   npm run validate:rewards
   ```

Both checks run automatically on pull requests when rewards.json or schema files are modified.






Tool reply
The file /Users/willlarson/app-imprint.co/AGENTS.md has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
    13→```bash
    14→npx prettier --write "**/rewards.json"
    15→```
    16→
    17→## JSON Schema Validation
    18→
    19→Validate rewards.json files against the schema:
    20→
    21→1. Install dependencies:
    22→   ```bash
    23→   npm install
    24→   ```
    25→
    26→2. Run validation:
    27→   ```bash
    28→   npm run validate:rewards
    29→   ```
    30→
    31→Both checks run automatically on pull requests when rewards.json or schema files are modified.
    32→
    33→## JSON Inheritance System
    34→
    35→Some content files are managed by an inheritance system in the `inherit/` directory. **Do not edit these content files directly** - they are generated from inherit files.


Assistant


Thinking
Now let me mark the todos as complete.


Assistant


☰ Task List
  • ✓Simplify inherit-validate.yml workflow
  • ✓Fix python to python3 in validate script
  • ✓Create .githooks/pre-commit hook
  • ✓Update AGENTS.md with hook instructions


Tool reply
Todos have been modified successfully. Ensure that you continue to use the todo list to track your progress. Please proceed with the current tasks if applicable


Assistant


Thinking
All done. Let me provide a summary of what was completed.


Assistant


All feedback incorporated:


Changes made:


    

  1. .github/workflows/inherit-validate.yml
    2. 

  2. Removed changed-files check (runs on all PRs now)
    3. 

  3. Added push trigger for main and release branches
    4. 

  4. 

    Changed python to python3
    

    5. 

  5. 

    scripts/validate_inherit.py and scripts/expand_inherit.py
    

    6. 

  6. 

    Fixed python → python3 in messages
    

    7. 

  7. 

    .githooks/pre-commit (new file)
    

    8. 

  8. Auto-runs expand_inherit.py when inherit files are staged
    9. 

  9. 

    Auto-adds generated content files to commit
    

    10. 

  10. 

    AGENTS.md
    

    11. 

  11. Added Git Hooks setup instructions
    12. 

  12. Added JSON Character Encoding section (from main)
    13. 

  13. Updated JSON Schema Validation to use npm run validate:rewards
    14.