Claude Code transcript

3 prompts · 181 messages · 53 tool calls · 0 commits · 1 pages

#1

ultrathink and review the PR: https://github.com/Imprint-Tech/infrastructure/actions/runs/20733304088/job/59525586584?pr=3034

5 mcp__github__pull_request_read · 4 bash · 2 read · 1 fetch · 1 write · 1 exitplanmode

I've completed a thorough review of PR #3034. Here's a summary:

PR Review Summary

PR #3034: Phase 1 Module Extraction Status: All CI checks passing (previous review comment resolved)

High Priority Issues (3)

  1. S3 Module Uses Deprecated Patterns (modules/s3/main.tf)
  2. Uses inline acl, logging, versioning, website, cors_rule on aws_s3_bucket

  3. Deprecated since AWS Provider 4.0; other modules (static_web, sftp) correctly use separate resources

  4. Hardcoded External IDs (modules/kinesis/locals.tf:10-13)

  5. Hevo connector external IDs are hardcoded in source code

  6. Should be variables with sensitive = true

  7. Overly Permissive KMS Policies (modules/ddb/policy_doc.tf, modules/kinesis/kms.tf)

  8. Both use principals { identifiers = ["*"] } in KMS policies
  9. Security scanners will flag this

Medium Priority (4)

  • Inconsistent enable/disable patterns (resource_count vs create vs nothing)
  • Duplicate aws_elb_service_account data source in S3 module
  • Missing prevent_destroy on SFTP S3 buckets
  • Potential KMS cross-region replication permission gaps

Low Priority (4)

  • Provider version constraint is loose (>= 3.75.0)
  • Missing variable validation blocks
  • Individual module READMEs are empty
  • Docs workflow job may need explicit write permissions

Recommendation

Address the 3 high-priority issues before merging. The S3 deprecated patterns are the most pressing as they'll cause issues with provider upgrades. Medium/low items can be follow-up work.

#2

1

10 read · 8 bash · 6 edit · 4 todo · 1 write · 1 glob

Now let me address the KMS key policy security concerns. The issue is using principals = ["*"] which is overly permissive. I'll tighten both policies to use the account root ARN instead, which still works with the service conditions but is more explicit and won't trigger security scanner warnings.

All 3 high-priority issues have been fixed:

1. S3 Module - Deprecated Resource Patterns ✓

  • modules/s3/main.tf: Rewrote to use AWS Provider 4.0+ separate resources instead of deprecated inline arguments
  • modules/s3/data.tf: Removed duplicate aws_elb_service_account data source
  • modules/s3/versions.tf: Updated provider requirement to >= 4.0

2. Kinesis Module - Hardcoded External IDs ✓

  • modules/kinesis/variables.tf: Added new hevo_connector_external_id variable with sensitive = true
  • modules/kinesis/locals.tf: Removed hardcoded external ID map, now uses the variable input

3. KMS Key Policies - Security Concerns ✓

  • modules/kinesis/kms.tf: Changed principal from "*" to explicit account root ARN arn:aws:iam::${local.aws_account_id}:root
  • modules/ddb/policy_doc.tf: Changed principal from "*" to explicit account root ARN, removed redundant kms:CallerAccount condition (already restricted by principal)

All changes validated successfully. The modules are ready for commit.

#3

For the DDB module I'm still getting this error on the PR: ╷ │ Error: Provider configuration not present │ │ To work with aws_kms_replica_key.us-east-2_replica its original provider │ configuration at │ provider["registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/aws"].replica-us-east-2 is │ required, but it has been removed. This occurs when a provider │ configuration is removed while objects created by that provider still exist │ in the state. Re-add the provider configuration to destroy │ aws_kms_replica_key.us-east-2_replica, after which you can remove the │ provider configuration again. ╵ ╷ │ Error: Provider configuration not present │ │ To work with aws_kms_replica_key.us-west-2_replica its original provider │ configuration at │ provider["registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/aws"].replica-us-west-2 is │ required, but it has been removed. This occurs when a provider │ configuration is removed while objects created by that provider still exist │ in the state. Re-add the provider configuration to destroy │ aws_kms_replica_key.us-west-2_replica, after which you can remove the │ provider configuration again. ╵ Error: Terraform exited with code 1. Error: Process completed with exit code 1. is there something we can do about this?

4 bash · 2 read · 2 write · 1 edit

Fixed the ddb module validation issue:

  1. Created modules/ddb/tests/validate.tf - A test fixture that:
  2. Defines all three required provider aliases (aws.default, aws.replica-us-west-2, aws.replica-us-east-2)
  3. Uses skip_credentials_validation = true so it works in CI without AWS credentials

  4. Calls the module with all required variables

  5. Updated .github/workflows/terraform-module-publish.yml - Modified the init and validate steps to:

  6. Check if a tests/ directory exists in the module
  7. If so, run terraform init/validate from the tests directory (through the fixture)
  8. Otherwise, run directly on the module as before

This pattern allows modules with configuration_aliases to be validated in CI. Other modules (s3, secret, kinesis, static_web, sftp) that don't require provider aliases will continue to work as they did before.